A Differential diagnostic tool for obstructive lung diseases in adults using classification models/ Daphne Faith Ochieng

By: Contributor(s): Publication details: Nairobi: Strathmore University; 2021.Description: xiii, 57p. ill. colSubject(s): LOC classification:
  • RC280.O245 2021
Online resources: Summary: The non-specificity of affective symptoms between asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a key challenge in medical practice. This is even more complicated when physicians fail to recognize the co-existence of these two diseases, a condition known as asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap. This occurrence mainly affects smokers, middle-aged and older age groups. Failure to diagnose a disease correctly and in a timely manner often leads to administration of wrong drug therapy, delayed treatment or wasted financial resources. To reduce the risk of misclassification, a differential diagnostic tool that can differentiate among patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap was developed based on measurements of spirometry, blood eosinophil count and smoking history. The study employed a judgmental sampling technique to draw 184 samples from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database based on three classes of obstructive lung diseases. Rapid application development methodology was used as the software methodology upon which the architecture was designed and developed. A comparative analysis was made between a number of classification algorithms including K-nearest neighbour, support vector machines, logistic regression, multilayer perceptron and random forest. The results demonstrate that the differential diagnosic tool can correctly classify patients with obstructive lung diseases with an accuracy of 93.94%, showing an automated approach that would aid physicians in making preliminary diagnoses, leading to optimization of time resources, lower medical device costs and better patient outcomes. Further research regarding the tool’s improvement should focus on using a more robust dataset and evaluation in liaison with a physician in a real clinical setting.
Reviews from LibraryThing.com:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Thesis Thesis Strathmore University (Main Library) Special Collection RC280.O245 2021 Not for loan 56079
Total holds: 0

The non-specificity of affective symptoms between asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a key challenge in medical practice. This is even more complicated when physicians fail to recognize the co-existence of these two diseases, a condition known as asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap. This occurrence mainly affects smokers, middle-aged and older age groups. Failure to diagnose a disease correctly and in a timely manner often leads to administration of wrong drug therapy, delayed treatment or wasted financial resources. To reduce the risk of misclassification, a differential diagnostic tool that can differentiate among patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap was developed based on measurements of spirometry, blood eosinophil count and smoking history. The study employed a judgmental sampling technique to draw 184 samples from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database based on three classes of obstructive lung diseases. Rapid application development methodology was used as the software methodology upon which the architecture was designed and developed. A comparative analysis was made between a number of classification algorithms including K-nearest neighbour, support vector machines, logistic regression, multilayer perceptron and random forest. The results demonstrate that the differential diagnosic tool can correctly classify patients with obstructive lung diseases with an accuracy of 93.94%, showing an automated approach that would aid physicians in making preliminary diagnoses, leading to optimization of time resources, lower medical device costs and better patient outcomes. Further research regarding the tool’s improvement should focus on using a more robust dataset and evaluation in liaison with a physician in a real clinical setting.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

© Strathmore University Library
Madaraka Estate, Ole Sangale Road | P. O. Box 59857 - 00200 City Square, Nairobi, Kenya
(+254) (0)703 034 000/200/300 | (+254) (0)20-607498